Racial Profiling Laws in California

One important case involved allegations of racial profiling against Hispanics by the California Highway Patrol. The plaintiffs alleged that CHP agents disproportionately stopped and searched minority cars. If you live in South Central or East Los Angeles, you don`t need us to talk about police and racial profiling. There is a chance that you or someone you know will feel attacked by law enforcement simply because of the color of your skin. (e) “racial or identity profiling” means, for the purposes of this Division, considering or relying on actual or perceived race, colour, ethnic origin, national origin, age, religion, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation or mental or physical disability, to decide which persons should be detained or to determine the scope or content of the Law Enforcement Measures after a control. However, an officer may consider or rely on the characteristics listed in a particular description of the suspect.  Activities include, but are not limited to, road or pedestrian stops or actions during a check, such as asking questions, pat-down, consensual and non-consensual searches of any person or property, seizing property, removing occupants from the vehicle during a traffic stop, issuing a quote and making an arrest. h) The program must be evidence-based and must include and review evidence-based models, practices and protocols composed of racial or identity profiling, including implicit bias.  This training should prescribe evidence-based models, practices and protocols that prevent racial or identity profiling.

 When developing the training, the Commission shall consult the Advisory Committee on Racial and Identity Profiling established in accordance with point (j).  The direction shall include, but not be limited to, a thorough examination of each of the following topics: E) Preparation of a report containing RIPA`s analysis pursuant to paragraphs A) to D), including detailed findings on the past and current state of racial profiling and identity profiling and policy recommendations for the elimination of racial and identity profiling.  RIPA publishes the report on its website.  Each report shall contain disaggregated statistical data for each reporting law enforcement authority.  The report must include at least the overall results of each reporting law enforcement agency for each data collection criterion in accordance with paragraph (b) of Article 12525.5 of the Government Code for each calendar year.  The reports are maintained and made available to the public by posting them on the Department of Justice`s OpenJustice web portal.  The first annual report is expected to be published no later than January 1, 2018.  The reports are public documents within the meaning of article 6252 (d) of the Government Code and may be consulted publicly under articles 6253, 6256, 6257 and 6258 of the Government Code. (b) Basic training courses for peace officers shall include appropriate training on race, identity and cultural diversity in order to promote mutual respect and cooperation between law enforcement agencies and members of all racial, identity and cultural groups.  In developing training, the Commission consults with appropriate groups and individuals with an interest and expertise in the area of race, identity, cultural awareness and diversity. Racial profiling is against the law in California and violates the U.S. Constitution.

(2) Racial or identity profiling is a practice that poses a serious threat to the fundamental principles of our Constitution and a democratic society.  This is despicable and cannot be tolerated. (C) Work with state and local law enforcement agencies to review and analyze race and identity profiling policies and practices in geographic areas of California. Here, we focus on the ways racial profiling manifests itself in street law enforcement situations, including: Victims of racial profiling in California are often African Americans or Hispanics. But make no mistake – Asians5 and people from the Middle East – or people from another group can also be affected. Police officers likely did not engage in the harmful practice of racial profiling in these circumstances. They used race as a factor to lure Cleve not because of racial hostility or discriminatory intent, but because they were looking for a particular African-American suspect with tattoos in his hand and driving a white limousine with a dented wing. Also, the cops` tactics weren`t particularly aggressive.

The inquiry`s inquiry did not escalate into confrontation with violence, handcuffs, pat-downs or large-scale searches.6 This article focuses on racial profiling in law enforcement. If you have any questions after reading, we invite you to contact our California citizen attorneys for advice. The case was settled in 2003. The CHP has not admitted to doing anything wrong, but it has agreed to end the costly practices of consent research, which can be coercion, and drug investigations, which can be misused as camouflage for profiling.7 Criminal Code 13519.4 is one of California`s anti-discrimination laws and protects the constitutional rights of minorities and marginalized groups of all Kinds.

Main Menu